This lightweight, water-based hydrating serum contains a good mix of ingredients to calm redness and help reduce sensitive skin. Its only drawback is fragrance, and the fact that the scent lingers. When sensitive skin and redness are your concerns, fragrance-free should be your mantra, as fragrance can be a source of irritation (and more redness) for all skin types, but especially more sensitive skin.
That misstep makes Redness Relief Serum tough to recommend for its intended skin type and concerns, but overall it’s still a good serum front-loaded with antioxidant green tea (Camellia sinensis), which is also a potent anti-inflammatory.
Packaging wise, this comes in a squeeze tube outfitted with a smooth metal applicator. The metal applicator feels cooling, which those with reddened skin may appreciate, but again, this is not a product we feel confident recommending to those struggling with facial redness, including the skin disorder rosacea.
Keep this ultra-soothing treatment in your refrigerator--this spa-like gel mask cools on contact, helping to relieve irritation while delivering hydration. Drenches skin in hydration with moisture magnet hyaluronic acid. Suitable for all skin types.
Water, Glycerin, Pentylene Glycol, Butylene Glycol, Maltooligosyl Glucoside, Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, Saccharide Isomerate, Sodium Hyaluronate, Hydrogenated Starch Hydrolysate, Glyceryl Acrylate/Acrylic Acid Copolymer, Saccharomyces/ Zinc Ferment, Bisabolol, Hydroxypropyl Guar, Polysorbate 20, Disodium EDTA, Sodium Hydroxide, Carbomer, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Hexylene Glycol, Phenoxyethanol, Fragrance.
Proactiv Solution At-A-Glance
Strengths: Effective, elegant-textured AHA, BHA, and skin-lightening options; all sunscreens provide sufficient UVA protection; good options for controlling excess oil breakthrough, including a colorless pressed powder.
Weaknesses: Several products contain irritating ingredients that do not help acne-prone skin; some gimmicky products that no dermatologist-created line should be selling (they should know better); mostly substandard to poor makeup options, including a sulfur-based concealer.
Created by dermatologists Dr. Katie Rodan and Dr. Kathy Fields, Proactiv launched in 1995 as a three-step system sold via infomercial. With the doctors' endorsements and winning personalities along with a heap of testimonials from people who use the routine (including a rotating list of celebrities, which always garners attention), Proactiv remains a very successful brand that is still going strong. The effusiveness, medical background, accurate information about how acne forms, and sincerity of its creators definitely makes for compelling television (we admit to catching the infomercial on more than one sleepless night), but what about the products themselves? Are they the answer the ads promise?
The core system consists of a cleanser with benzoyl peroxide and scrub particles, a toner with glycolic acid, and a lotion that contains a low (but still effective) amount of benzoyl peroxide. No questions here, this is a straightforward routine and hardly unique to Proactiv! Some percentage of people will benefit from daily use of this system (it contains the basics that are necessary for over-the-counter treatment of acne), but it's definitely not for everyone, and every dermatologist knows that (just check out the American Academy of Dermatology Web site at www.aad.org, for example, on their recommendations for battling blemishes).
It also goes without saying that other lines offer many less expensive versions of all the Proactiv products. However, for those who choose this system, the key is compliance, at least as long as you're seeing good results. Anyone battling acne needs to know that, barring a successful experience with the prescription drug Accutane, it cannot be cured—only controlled. We don't doubt that many people have seen their acne respond positively to a daily routine of the core Proactiv products, and for some it has been a life-changing experience—but it's not the answer for acne for everyone.
Although they still appear in ads and literature for the brand, Drs. Rodan and Fields have branched out to create their own namesake line, reviewed elsewhere on this site. While the Rodan + Fields line is not acne-centric like Proactiv, they did include products for blemishes, a few of which are similar to but more expensive than their Proactiv counterparts. And of course, this dual branding begs the question: if Rodan and Fields believe that Proactiv is the best option for those struggling with acne, why did they create alternative products in their namesake line? Why not just mention to Rodan + Fields customers dealing with acne that the Proactiv line has exactly what they need?
Along with Proactiv and the namesame Rodan and Fields line, these dermatologists also created Proactiv+, which is supposed to be smarter and faster than original Proactiv. For the most part, these products are quite similar, they just have a stronger emphasis on anti-aging issues such as uneven skin tone and enlarged pores from sun damage. We wish these products were more compelling, but many of them are truly problematic and not something two reputable dermatologists should feel comfortable putting their names on.
The Beautypedia and Paula’s Choice Research teams have one mission: To help you find the best products for your skin, whether they’re from Paula’s Choice or another brand. By combining efforts, we’re able to share scientific research and remain committed to the highest standards based on our decades of experience objectively reviewing thousands upon thousands of skincare and makeup formularies in all price ranges.
Beautypedia cuts through the hype to bring you product insights and recommendations you won’t find anywhere else!