It seems every cosmetics company these days has to have a BB cream, and that's the case with Flower Beauty as well. Before we get to the heart of our review, we need to delve a bit into what "BB cream" really means.
Ultimately, it's all about labeling and marketing – getting consumers to buy a product because they think it's something new and different - nothing more. Generally, a BB cream from U.S. cosmetics brands is similar to a tinted moisturizer, while another type of product known as CC cream is more like a liquid foundation, but not always. BB and CC creams typically provide sun protection, and may or may not include beneficial ingredients like antioxidants or skin-lightening agents. In other words, neither BB nor CC creams are as revolutionary as they are made out to be, and there is certainly no consistency among products from different brands.
Flower Beauty's take on BB creams isn't anything special, seeming more like a "me too" product than a "Hey, look, we really developed an innovative BB cream!" There's no sun protection or antioxidants, and while this formula does contain some peptides, they're likely not present in an amount likely to make a significant difference.
As far as a foundation-type product, BB Cream performs well enough, but again, the results aren't outstanding. It comes in a squeeze tube and has a creamy, though not thick, consistency; It's easy to smooth across your face to achieve medium coverage over redness and imperfections; and it dries to a natural-looking demi-matte finish.
The main issue is that this starts to emphasize lines about halfway through its wear-time, and it highlights larger pores as well. It doesn't fade, though, lasting throughout a standard work day. The range of shades is limited, but they are natural-looking for their intended skin tones, although the BB2 shade is a bit too yellow.
Overall, this isn't the worst BB choice, but you can find much better options on our list of Best Tinted Moisturizers/BB Creams.
Water, Cyclopentasiloxane, Glycerin, Sorbitan Isostearate, Stearoyl Inulin, Caprylyl Dimethicone, Ethoxy Glucoside, Cyclohexasiloxane, Aluminum/Magnesium Hydroxide Stearate, Phenoxyethanol, Sodium Chloride, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Isopropyl Titanium Triisostearate, Dimethicone, Sodium Dehydroacetate, Methylparaben, Propylparaben, Ethylparaben, Laureth-4, Ascrobyl Palmitate, Tocopherol, Palmitoyl Dipeptide-5, Diaminobutyroyl Hydroxythreonine, Palmitoyl Dipeptide-5 Diaminohydroxybutyrate. May Contain: Mica, Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides, Ultramarines.
Strengths: Most products are either minimally fragranced or fragrance-free; some excellent lip products; very good liquid eyeliners; good and long-lasting blushes and powder products; affordable.
Weaknesses: The majority of foundations are mediocre; no products offering SPF; exaggerated anti-aging claims with one foundation and one concealer; a lipliner that tugs on lips; some so-so 2-in-1 products; a lack of foundations for oily skin.
Regardless of how much technology has advanced or how much cosmetics formulas have improved, for many it’s still the allure of a celebrity name behind a beauty brand that’s the draw, not anything else. That’s the hook for Flower Beauty, backed by Hollywood doyenne Drew Barrymore.
Barrymore’s is a story many of us saw played out in the media. She was famous early on as a child actress (her first job was when she was just 11 months old), became a superstar thanks to Steven Spielberg’s film E.T, then succumbed to drug addiction and went through rehab at the tender age of 14. After successful treatment, she returned to acting, working steadily in both independent projects and blockbuster films. She gained a reputation as a largely good-natured, girl-next-door actress with a “flower child” free spirit persona, and she still comes across that way in interviews. In the mid-1990s, she formed her own production company, Flower Films, and has gone on to both direct and produce movies while still acting.
Barrymore’s commercial appeal didn’t go unnoticed by cosmetics companies, and in 2007 she became a brand ambassador for the makeup brand CoverGirl, appearing in both print and television ads that she helped create. After five successful years as one of the faces of CoverGirl, Barrymore parted ways with the brand to create Flower Beauty, a Wal-Mart-exclusive line that competes directly with CoverGirl, which is also sold at Wal-Mart. Flower Beauty makeup is manufactured by Maesa, a company that also produces the Benefit Cosmetics skincare line and Saks Fifth Avenue’s in-house cosmetics.
Clicking around on Flower Beauty’s site, you won’t see much about exactly why Barrymore chose this particular endeavor, save that she wanted to offer people high-end quality makeup at drugstore prices. That’s not really much of a reason, however, as many drugstore lines already offer department store-quality cosmetics, although “department store quality” isn’t much of a guideline, given that there are plenty of department store brands that aren’t as good as their drugstore counterparts!
The Flower Beauty brand’s strong suit is definitely its lip products, most of which pack a potent color punch and feel great. There are some beautiful matte options, as well as a great gloss and some moisturizing colored lip balms.
Most of the mascaras perform well and don’t clump or flake, and their powder products (blush, eyeshadow, and foundation) are good across the board. The liquid liners are also excellent, offering fine-point tips for precision lining with no-smudge wear. We’re also happy to say that even for this brand, with the name Flower, most of the products are either fragrance-free or contain minimal fragrance.
On the other hand, just like not all of Barrymore’s films have been crowd-pleasers, her makeup line also has some missteps, the biggest being that the majority of the foundations aren’t impressive. Though both a tinted moisturizer and a BB cream are part of Flower’s offerings, neither has the SPF or antioxidants that have become the selling points for such multi-tasking products. Some of the foundations are difficult to blend, while others tend to draw attention to lines on the face, and we didn’t find viable options for those with oily skin. There’s also the issue that a couple of the products are touted on the website for their anti-aging benefits, but Flower’s products contain only small amounts of the beneficial ingredients that would make them a wise choice for anti-aging benefits, especially in comparison to the amounts in other products we rate highly.
Flower also offers some 2-in-1 combo products that could add convenience to your makeup routine, but in many cases, such as the combo eyeliner and mascara or the eyeliner and eyeshadow duo, one of the products performs well, while the other is lackluster, which means even though the prices are reasonable, you’re not getting your money’s worth.
As a whole, though, Flower Beauty has a lot of strong suits, and it’s definitely worth considering if you’re in the market for lower-cost makeup products that offer solid performance.
For more information, visit www.flowerbeauty.com.
The Beautypedia and Paula’s Choice Research teams have one mission: To help you find the best products for your skin, whether they’re from Paula’s Choice or another brand. By combining efforts, we’re able to share scientific research and remain committed to the highest standards based on our decades of experience objectively reviewing thousands upon thousands of skincare and makeup formularies in all price ranges.
Beautypedia cuts through the hype to bring you product insights and recommendations you won’t find anywhere else!