45
Mary Kay TimeWise Pore Minimizer
1.00 fl. oz. for $ 27.00
Expert Rating
Expert Reviews
Community Reviews
Claims
Ingredients
Brand Overview

Is there any question as to what Timewise Pore Minimizer is supposed to do? We think not! Positioned as a serum for those with noticeable pores, this silky, water-based formula wins points for its ability to smooth skin texture as it softly blurs the look of pores. You won't see a major difference in pore size, but those with combination to oily or breakout-prone skin will appreciate how light this feels and the visible results.

As with most such products, the pore-minimizing results are short-term, more of a visual trick than actually making pores smaller. However, if you pair this with a leave-on BHA (salicylic acid) exfoliant and a product that contains a high amount (above 4%) of niacinamide, you will likely be thrilled. That's because salicylic acid and niacinamide really can reduce the appearance of pore size and improve pore function. Such actions make the results from Timewise Pore Minimizer even more apparent, plus you'll get oil-free hydration and a soft, radiant glow.

The only drawback is a tiny amount of fragrant lavender extract; however, Timewise Pore Minimizer doesn't have a telltale lavender scent. Otherwise, this is a good choice for a multi-tasking hydrator for the large-pored among us.

Pros:
  • Lightweight lotion glides over skin.
  • Softly blurs the appearance of pores.
  • Instantly smooths skin texture.
  • Adds a soft, radiant glow to skin.
  • Good mix of plant-derived antioxidants.
Cons:
  • Contains fragrant lavender extract.
Jar Packaging: No
Tested on animals: Yes
This gentle, fast-absorbing serum provides a daily defense against the look of enlarged pores. It reduces the appearance of pores and immediately improves skin texture, leaving skin feeling nourished and relieved of stress while visibly improving skin clarity. Now when you look in the mirror, all youll see is a close-up-confident complexion. After using pore minimizer twice a day for three weeks, eight out of 10 women said theyre happier with the look of their pores, even close-up.
Water, Glycerin, Cyclopentasiloxane, Polysilicone-11, Pentaerythrityl Tetraethylhexanoate, Dipropylene Glycol, Methyl/Methyacrylate Crosspolymer, Betaine, BIS-PEG/PPG-16/16 Dimethicone, Sodium Hyaluronate, Evodia Rutaecarpa Fruit Extract, Albizia Jurlbrissin Bark Extract, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Sea Whip Extract, Hydrolyzed Soy Flour, Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, Hydroxyethylacrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taruate Copolymer, Mica, Isohexadecane, Ceteareth-33, Titanium Dioxide, Decylene Glycol, Magnesium Aluminum Silicate, Xanthan Gum, Dimethicone, Polysorbate 50, Butylene Glycol, Hydroxpropyl Cyclodextrin, Sorbitan Isostearate, Triethyl Citrate, Lavandula Angustifolium (Lavender) Flower/Stem Extract, Propanediol, Cyclohexasiloxane, Sodium Benzoate, Elettaria Cardamomum Seed Extract, Pyrus Malus (Apple) Fruit Extract, Rubus Idaeus (Raspberry) Fruit Extract, 1, 2 Hexanediol, Disodium EDTA, Phenoxyethanol, Iodopropynyl Butylcarbamate.

Mary Kay At-A-Glance

Strengths: Most of the products are fragrance-free; packaging that keeps light- and air-sensitive ingredients stable during use; a handful of well-formulated moisturizers; very good eye-makeup remover; effective wrinkle filler; excellent cream blush and several other impressive makeup products.

Weaknesses: The overall collection is a mixed bag of exciting and disappointing products; several outdated moisturizers and cleansers; no AHA or acceptable BHA products; the CC Cream doesn't provide good enough UVA protection; some lackluster makeup products.

The last few years haven't been glamorous for one of the world's largest direct sellers of cosmetics. Mary Kay lost a lawsuit filed by TriStrata, the company whose founders hold over 100 patents on the use of AHAs in skin-care products. It was revealed that Mary Kay's former AHA products infringed on three of these patents, and, after some back-and-forths in court, Mary Kay ended up paying royalties of over $40 million (interest included) to TriStrata. Perhaps because they're still licking their wounds after this defeat, the company has not launched any new AHA products, and no longer sells the ones that were in question during the legal battle (Source: www.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2006/04/03/daily26.html).

However, the company's spin on the issue of AHAs is that they no longer use them because skin-care technology has advanced. That's an interesting twist, but the fact of the matter is that AHA products, when well-formulated, are still considered advanced and capable of doing far more for skin than the alternatives Mary Kay has devised (including an at-home microdermabrasion scrub and products with vitamin C derivatives).

Although they're not a company for you if you are looking for exfoliants (though you should be looking for a good exfoliant), Mary Kay has recently developed a surprising number of excellent products. With over 1.6 million Mary Kay consultants selling products in 30 countries, this family-owned company (founder Mary Kay Ash passed away in 2001) has slowly been proving that they intend to remain competitive with the best of the best. A refreshing change of pace is the omission of fragrance from almost all of the products. Now that is what we call progress!

Despite its size and capital (wholesale figures were $3 billion in 2012), Mary Kay still has a lot to learn. For instance, although their guiding philosophy of empowering women is admirable, the assortment of products still leaves much to be desired. Yes, things are looking up, but there are several weak spots that keep Mary Kay from being in the same league as Avon, Estee Lauder, Procter & Gamble (Olay), and Johnson & Johnson (Neutrogena, Aveeno, RoC). These include outdated cleansers, toners, and moisturizers, along with letdowns in products designed for oily, blemish-prone skin. The TimeWise product range has expanded considerably, and offers a few state-of-the-art products worthy of its name (although, as with all skin-care products, they're not going to turn back the hands of time and erase all signs of aging).

If improvements like those in Mary Kay's latest products were translated to the entire line, it would be standing much taller, at least as far as what current, substantiated skin-care research indicates is optimum for creating and maintaining healthy skin. As is, this is a line to approach with a keen understanding of what to focus on and what to avoid. One last bit of good news: Mary Kay offers well-packaged samples of selected products, either directly or from your consultant.

Unless mentioned otherwise, all Mary Kay products are fragrance-free.

Note: Mary Kay is categorized as a brand that tests on animals because their products are sold in China. Although Mary Kay does not conduct animal testing for their products sold elsewhere, the Chinese government requires imported cosmetics be tested on animals, so foreign companies retailing there must comply. This requirement is why some brands state that they dont test on animals unless required by law. Animal rights organizations consider cosmetic companies retailed in China to be brands that test on animals, and so does the Beautypedia Research Team.

For more information about Mary Kay, call (800) 627-9529 or visit www.marykay.com.

About the Experts

The Beautypedia and Paula’s Choice Research teams have one mission: To help you find the best products for your skin, whether they’re from Paula’s Choice or another brand. By combining efforts, we’re able to share scientific research and remain committed to the highest standards based on our decades of experience objectively reviewing thousands upon thousands of skincare and makeup formularies in all price ranges.

Beautypedia cuts through the hype to bring you product insights and recommendations you won’t find anywhere else!