Here's another eye-area product claiming to address those pesky problems most of us would rather be rid of: crow's-feet, eye puffiness, and dark circles.
First things first: There's nothing in this gel that makes it specific for use around the eye area. See More Info for why you might not need an eye area-specific product.
That said, this gel feels lightweight and soothing. It does take a couple of minutes to dry down, but once it does it sinks into skin without any residue (a common trait for some gel products). Contrary to Elizabeth Arden's claims, there isn't any "instant brightening" effect with this gel, though any moisture added to the eye area will make it look at least temporarily better (though this product doesn't offer much in the way of "moisture").
This formula contains the standard blend of ceramides that Arden is famous for, along with other cell-communicating ingredients to help repair skin's barrier and act younger. While that mix is definitely good for your skin, this gel could have contained a lot more for treating skin in the eye area.
We would like to have seen a larger and more interesting blend of antioxidants included, which can combat the free-radical damage responsible for many of the signs of aging. There's also a lack of sophisticated emollients, as well as a lack of SPF, which, if included, would make this a much better option for daytime. Sun damage is one of the leading causes of dark circles, so using products with SPF in the eye area is critical to keeping them at bay!
On balance, while this formula certainly isn't bad for the eye area, it's just not as intriguing or beneficial as the ones you'll find on our list of Best Eye Moisturizers, and it definitely isn't emollient enough for those with prominent lines or dry skin in the eye area.
Note: The amount of film-forming agents in this gel can give you the sensation (false in this case) that it is actually tightening sagging skin. Sadly, it cannot do that; if anything, those ingredients can be problematic in the eye area.
Most eye-specific products aren't necessary. That's either because they are poorly formulated, contain nothing special for the eye area, or come in packaging that won't keep the key ingredients stable. Just because the product is labeled an eye cream doesn't mean it's good for your eye area; in fact, many can actually make matters worse.
There is much you can do to improve signs of aging around your eyes. Any product loaded with antioxidants, skin-repairing ingredients, skin-lightening ingredients, anti-inflammatory ingredients, and effective emollients will work wonders and those ingredients don't have to come from a product labeled eye gel or eye cream. You would be shocked how many eye gels lack even the most basic ingredients to help skin. For example, most eye-area products (like this one) don't contain sunscreen. During the day that is a serious problem because it leaves the skin around your eyes vulnerable to sun damage and this absolutely will make dark circles, puffiness, and wrinkles worse!
Whatever product you put around your eye area, regardless of what it is labeled, must be well formulated and appropriate for the skin type around your eyes! That may mean you need an eye cream or gel, but you might also do just as well by applying your regular facial moisturizer around your eyes.
This luxurious eye gel instantly brightens as it fights the appearance signs of stress and fatigue around the eyes. Reinforces skin in the delicate eye area to reduce the look of existing fine lines, puffiness and dark circles.
Water/Aqua/Eau, Cyclopentasiloxane, Dimethicone, Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, Pentylene Glycol, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, PEG-11 Methyl Ether Dimethicone, Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer, Adenosine, Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate/Beheneth-25 Methacrylate Crosspolymer, Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP Copolymer, Ascophyllum Nodosum Extract, Asparagopsis Armata Extract, C13-14 Isoparaffin, Caprylyl Glycol, Carbomer, Ceramide 1, Ceramide 3, Ceramide 6 LI, Cholesterol, Dimethiconol, Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate, Disodium EDTA, Ethylhexylglycerin, Fucose, Glucose, Glucuronic Acid, Hydrolyzed Soy Protein, Hydrolyzed Yeast Protein, Laureth-7, Mica, Phytosphingosine, Polyacrylamide, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Sodium Hyaluronate, Sodium Hydroxide, Sodium Lauroyl Lactylate, Sorbitol, Tin Oxide, Xanthan Gum, Chlorphenesin, Phenoxyethanol, Potassium Sorbate, Sodium Benzoate, Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891).
Elizabeth Arden At-A-Glance
Strengths: Some excellent serums and a few noteworthy moisturizers; praiseworthy concealers; a handful of well-formulated makeup products including foundation, blush, eyeshadow, and lipstick.
Weaknesses: No products for those battling blemishes; several products whose sunscreen lacks sufficient UVA protection; most of the foundations with sunscreen fail to provide sufficient UVA protection; lackluster eye and brow pencils; some problematic lip color products; jar packaging weakens some otherwise great formulas.
Former nurse Elizabeth Arden was a pioneer in the beauty industry. At the turn of the 20th century, Arden began her legacy when she opened her first salon, with the now-familiar red door. Over the next several years she introduced new products and services to women unaccustomed to such choices, and almost single-handedly made it acceptable for modern women to wear makeup. And while Arden understood and met these beauty needs, she was also adept at self-promotion and packaging, helping to solidify the idea that what holds the product should be as beautiful as the woman who uses it. She was the front-runner in the cosmetics industry for quite some time, until another young go-getter by the name of Estee Lauder began her own empire—one that would eventually lead to the Elizabeth Arden line being almost an afterthought in the mind of many consumers.
Not only has Arden's image been diminished over the years due to odd distribution patterns (consumers were getting mixed messages as this prestige line began showing up in drug and discount chain stores), but also through their own formulary mistakes and seeming unwillingness to pay attention to current research. Given the history of this line and several outstanding products they've produced in the past, it's very frustrating that what's offered today is such a mishmash of good and bad, with a hefty dose of average. Arden still has several sunscreens that fall short by leaving out sufficient UVA protection. In contrast, Estee Lauder and the Lauder-owned lines have their sunscreen acts together and consistently impress by including other state-of-the-art goodies to amplify the environmental protection of their moisturizers.
Many of Arden's products also contain potentially problematic ingredients or are packaged in a way that puts the light- and air-sensitive ingredients at risk of breaking down shortly after the product is opened. Given Elizabeth Arden's (the woman) pioneering, innovative spirit, we can't imagine her being completely pleased with the state of her namesake skin-care line (Arden passed away in 1966). Having the gorgeous Catherine Zeta-Jones as a spokesmodel for most of the early 2000s may have raised more interest in this brand than in years past, but a pretty face and eye-catching ads don't always translate to good skin care, as evidenced by the reviews on this site. There are some very impressive products in this line, but it's definitely one that demands careful attention to what you're buying lest you put your skin at risk.
For more information about Elizabeth Arden, call (800) 326-7337 or visit www.elizabetharden.com.
Elizabeth Arden Makeup
Cosmetics trailblazer Elizabeth Arden may have been single-handedly responsible for bringing modern makeup to American women (she opened the famous Red Door Salon in 1910 and formulated the first blush and tinted powders in 1912), but today's lineup of Arden makeup has far more disappointments than its pioneering namesake would have liked. Most of the Arden foundations with sunscreen either leave out the five prime UVA-screening active ingredients or because their SPF numbers are unnecessarily low. Either way, only one of the foundations with sunscreens can be relied on as your sole source of facial sun protection.
In contrast to the mostly disappointing foundations, you'll be pleased with what Arden offers for concealer, eyeshadow, lipstick, and mascara. Each of these categories has some brilliant products to consider, and they serve to prove, at least to a modest extent, that Elizabeth Arden makeup is not to be counted out just yet. The remaining products have little to extol, either because they are truly ineffective or because the competition has Arden beat by a mile. A continual bright spot for Arden is that their tester units are typically well organized and the colors are grouped so it's easy to zero in on what you like.
The Beautypedia and Paula’s Choice Research teams have one mission: To help you find the best products for your skin, whether they’re from Paula’s Choice or another brand. By combining efforts, we’re able to share scientific research and remain committed to the highest standards based on our decades of experience objectively reviewing thousands upon thousands of skincare and makeup formularies in all price ranges.
Beautypedia cuts through the hype to bring you product insights and recommendations you won’t find anywhere else!